Site icon Aviation Gurukul, GOLN

English Language Proficiency Requirements

English Language Proficiency Requirements

English Language Proficiency Requirements

English Language Proficiency Requirements

English Language Proficiency Requirements

Description

This article outlines standards and recommended practices, as of early 2021, for aircraft pilots and air traffic controllers to attain one of three recognized levels of English language proficiency (ELP). In many cases, specific language proficiency is required to comply with license qualifications.

The article focuses on relevant International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) standards and recommended practices and the European Union’s ELP adoption decisions.

Standardization of ELP requirements mitigates known risks of accidents in many types of flight operations, including business aviation and commercial air transportation between nations or regions.

Benefits from standard-setting include fully understood communications between pilots and controllers, despite distracting non-standard words and phrases.

High-level proficiency also enhances situational awareness through controller interactions and monitoring of surrounding air traffic communications.

Background

For 70 years, ICAO has analyzed risks involving linguistic issues, raised awareness of systemic risks, and pursued mitigations. From 2011–to 2021, ICAO and other stakeholders began to refine first-generation ELP standards and recommended practices.

ICAO set its first deadline — March 2008 — for the ICAO Member States, planning for ELP standards to take effect at Level 4, Level 5, or Level 6 for all pilots flying international routes and all air traffic controllers serving international airports and routes.

States unable to meet the first deadline were granted time to implement the acceptable language proficiency levels by March 2011. By 2013, ICAO reported that some Member States had serious difficulty and called on other nations to assist them.

ELP involves both native and non-native English speakers. According to ICAO, the burden for improving this aspect of aeronautical communications should not be seen as falling solely upon non-native English speakers.

Its Manual on the Implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements (Doc 9835), states: “Native speakers of English, too, have a fundamentally important role to play in the international efforts to increase communication safety.”

The following bullet points list basic concepts and expectations from FCL.055 Language Proficiency, a source frequently referenced by ICAO, EU, and UK CAA requirements:

International Standards

The current requirements for ELP license endorsement of operational personnel primarily are detailed in ICAO Annex 1 — Personnel Licensing and explained in Manual on the Implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements, ICAO Doc 9835 (see References).

 

Annex 1, 1.2.9, “Language Proficiency” (July 2018) includes the following selected facts about the applicability of ELP to specific aviation professions:

 

Reassessment Procedures

As noted above, ICAO requires that the language skills of pilots and controllers rated at Level 4 are reassessed every three years, Level 5 pilots and controllers – every six years, while at Level 6, no further assessment of English language skills is deemed necessary.

Level 4 (operational) proficiency is considered as a minimum ‘stepping stone’ to higher levels. The main benefit of high international standards of aviation English is that communications between aircraft crew and controllers are fully understood, particularly when non-standard words and phrases are used. Also, improved language skills could help increase the situational awareness of flight crews about other aircraft, both in the air and on the ground.

Note: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/340 states that the validity of the language proficiency endorsement for expert level (level six) is nine years from the date of assessment, for the English language. This provision is applicable to air traffic controllers in the EU member states.

Accidents and Incidents

The following events include “Language Clarity” as a contributory factor:

 

References

Related Articles

Further Reading

ICAO

UK CAA

Read more:

ELPAC

Cross-checking Process

Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC)

Conflict Detection with Adjacent Sectors

Communication Guide for General Aviation VFR Flights

Exit mobile version